Amy Boucher
March
14, 2014
Supervisors adopt nepotism policy, 3-2
Policy proposer votes no; says it is not an anti-nepotism
policy
INDEPENDENCE
-- The rift among members of the Grayson County Board of Supervisors was
apparent again Thursday night as they divided over an anti-nepotism policy
first proposed at their organizational meeting in January. The board voted 3-2
to adopt a policy that would prohibit the supervisors from hiring family
members but would allow them to appoint family members to boards, authorities,
committees or commissions. The policy allows only one such family appointment
per board, authority or commission and prohibits supervisors from serving on
the same board or commission as a family member.
"Family
member" includes spouse, parents, grandparents, children, grandchildren,
brothers, sisters, mothers- and fathers-in-law, brothers- and sisters-in-law,
sons- and daughters-in-law, uncles, aunts, nieces, nephews and adopted, half
and step members of the immediate family.
The
supervisors are responsible for disclosing their familial relationships prior
to any consideration of employment or appointment.
"This
is not anti-nepotism," said Oldtown Supervisor Kenneth Belton, who asked
for a policy in January, explaining his negative vote. This policy would allow
supervisors to appoint family members to many different boards, he said.
Elk
Creek Supervisor Brenda Sutherland also voted no. She said the draft policy
that was defeated by the other three supervisors in February was a "true
anti-nepotism policy."
That
draft would not have allowed the Grayson supervisors to hire or appoint any
"family member."
County
Administrator Jonathan Sweet offered another option, which also would have
prohibited employment or appointment of family members, but would have omitted
aunts and uncles from the definition of family members.
At-large
Supervisor David Sexton moved to adopt the more lenient option, which allows
family members to serve on boards. Chairman John Brewer told Sweet last month
that he thought one family member should be able to serve per board or
commission.
When
Sutherland objected to the proposal, Sexton said that most anti-nepotism
policies refer to employment, and that the proposal clearly excludes hiring of
family members. He recalled that Belton did not want supervisors to be able to
"stack the deck" on boards or commissions, and said that limiting
participation to only one member of a supervisor's family would prevent that.
"We've
always got the safety valve of the board," Wilson District
Supervisor Glen Eddie Rosenbaum added. The supervisors must approve all appointments and he said
he couldn't think of any appointments made by the supervisors leading to a
family member doing something "out of line."
He
asked the county administrator if he could think of any examples. Appearing
non-plussed, Sweet said he was not prepared to offer any examples.
Rosenbaum
said the policy gave the supervisors "a little room to move" so that
they could appoint a relative if the relative is more qualified than any other
candidate.
Brewer
said many times it's hard to fill positions and the supervisors sometimes
appoint family members "out of desperation."
"I
just don't think it's right," Belton said, and reiterated his support for
the draft prohibiting family members from employment or appointment.
Following
adoption of the policy, the supervisors voted 3-2 (along the same lines) to
recommend appointment of Greg Hash to the county Zoning Board of Appeals. The
circuit court judge makes this appointment, based on the supervisors'
recommendation.
Rosenbaum
nominated Hash, with Sexton seconding.
Hash
would replace Tony Caudill, who expressed a desire to continue to serve and who
was nominated by Belton and seconded by Sutherland.
About
Caudill, Rosenbaum said, "I don't know this gentleman and I've got a
problem voting for somebody I don't know about....what they stand for."
For that reason, he "went out and found somebody."
Greg
Hash is the husband of Lisa Hash, whom Rosenbaum nominated in February for the
county Planning Commission and who was appointed.
Brewer
asked Rosenbaum if he wanted to interview Caudill.
"No,
I'm fine with my motion," Rosenbaum said.
After
the vote Belton said, "I do know Mr. Hash and he'll be excellent,"
adding that Caudill had done a fine job.
No comments:
Post a Comment